 |
Embassy security looks through a binocular as he guards in front of the US Embassy in Jakarta in this file photo taken on March 14, 2006. (EPA Photo/Adi Weda) |
Indonesia
has demanded the United States formally clarify a news report that its embassy
in Jakarta has been used as a base to hack into the electronic communications
of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and other Indonesian leaders.
Indonesian
experts and lawmakers have asked the government to stand up to the US, and to
take stern actions, including sending home several American diplomats or scale
back Indonesia’s diplomatic mission in that country.
The Sydney
Morning Herald reported — quoting intelligence data leaked by US intelligence
whistle-blower Edward Snowden and several Australian officials — that the US
Embassy in Jakarta was one of the super power’s 90 surveillance facilities
worldwide used to monitor “nearly everything a typical user does on the
Internet” including e-mailing, web browsing, Internet searches and social
media.
Foreign
Minister Marty Natalegawa called on Wednesday for Kristen Bauer, the US
Embassy’s charge d’affaires, to confirm whether there was any credibility to
the news.
“Indonesia
can’t accept it and has lodged a strong protest on the news that there are
wiretapping facilities inside the US Embassy in Jakarta,” Marty said in a
statement sent to the Jakarta Globe.
The Herald
also reported, late on Wednesday, that the Australian Embassy in Jakarta was
being used for the same illegal purposes of spying on Indonesian officials. An
Indonesian official said the Australian ambassador will be summoned to the
Indonesian Foreign Ministry’s office to provide an explanation.
Australian
intelligence sources confirmed to Fairfax Media that Australia’s electronic
espionage agency, the Defense Signals Directorate, is a “full partner” in the
program, which they said “overwhelmingly harvests diplomatic, political and
economic intelligence, not just information relating to terrorism and
security.”
The
operations are said to take up an entire room within the embassy compound and
that local telephone calls can be listened to at will.
Getting the
US to explain
As for the
US in the meantime, Marty has asked for an explanation from US officials.
“I have
talked with the US Embassy charge d’affaires and demand an official explanation
from the US government on the news,” Marty said. “If it’s confirmed, then the
activities are not just security breaches but also a serious violation of
diplomatic norms and ethics. It’s certainly against the spirit of interstate
friendship,” he added.
Bauer is
temporary representing the US as Robert Balke, the designated ambassador to
Jakarta, has yet to arrive in the city.
During
Marty’s phone call to Bauer, the charge d’affaires was only listening, said an
official, who asked for anonymity.
“She can’t
say anything because she has to report back to Washington. That’s why we are
now waiting for the US response,” the unidentified official said.
He said
that whatever the answer, Indonesia would ask the US not to conduct any illegal
surveillance with the country in the future, and would demand a political
commitment to respect the friendship that Indonesia and the US have forged so
far.
When contacted
by the Jakarta Globe, US Embassy press attache Troy Pederson confirmed that the
charge d’affaires has spoken with the Indonesian foreign ministry about the
matter.
“We will
continue to address these issues in diplomatic channels with our partners and
allies,” he said.
Fachry Ali,
a senior political expert at the Indonesian Institute of Sciences, said the
damage has been done on the image of the US, and that Indonesia — as well as
many countries in the world — has lost trust on whatever the US has to say and
do.
“It’s
against human rights — illegal and an attack on our sovereignty. So what else
is left? We probably will keep on suspecting the US diplomats even when we do
something together,” he said. “Indonesia should be tougher on this issue.”
Ethically
wrong
Hikmahanto
Juwana, a law professor at the University of Indonesia, said actions by the US
were against international ethics and law.
“There are
a number of measures to show that we can’t accept such conduct. We can expel
several US diplomats or scale down our representation in the US. But the
question is do we dare to do such things?” he said.
Hikmahanto
said Jakarta’s reaction would most likely only be aimed at taming public anger,
and should the US provide an explanation, do nothing.
He said
Indonesia should be more cautious in the future when having to work together
with the US.
“BIN
[Indonesian Intelligence Agency] should actively do its own part to prevent
such massive wiretapping from happening again,” he said.
While
Indonesia awaits a US response, it also seeks an explanation from Australia on
alleged spying activities.
Fairfax
Media, the owner of the Herald, has been told that Australia’s collection of
signals intelligence takes place from embassies in Jakarta, Bangkok, Hanoi,
Beijing and Dili, and High Commissions in Kuala Lumpur and Port Moresby, as
well as other diplomatic posts.
A secret US
National Security Agency document leaked by Snowden and published by Germany’s
Der Spiegel reveals the existence of a highly sensitive signals intelligence
collection program conducted from sites at US embassies and consulates and from
the diplomatic missions of other “five eyes” intelligence partners including
Australia, Britain and Canada.
Code named
“Stateroom,” the program involves the interception of radio, telecommunications
and internet traffic.
The
document explicitly states that the Australian Defense Signals Directorate
operates Stateroom facilities “at Australian diplomatic facilities.”
Surveillance
in small size
The
document notes that the surveillance facilities “are small in size and in
number of personnel staffing them.”
“They are
covert, and their true mission is not known by the majority of the diplomatic
staff at the facility where they are assigned,” the document says.
The NSA
document also observed that the facilities were carefully concealed. “For
example antennas are sometimes hidden in false architectural features or roof
maintenance sheds,” according to the report.
A former
Australian Defense Intelligence Organization officer told Fairfax Media that
the interception facility at the Australian Embassy in Jakarta played an
important role in collecting intelligence on terrorist threats and
people-smuggling, “but the main focus is political, diplomatic and economic
intelligence.”
“The huge
growth of mobile phone networks has been a great boon and Jakarta’s political
elite are a loquacious bunch; even when they think their own intelligence
services are listening they just keep talking,” the source said.
He said the
Australian Consulate in Denpasar, Bali, has also been used for signals
intelligence collection.
An
Indonesian official said Indonesia would lodge a similar complaint with the
Australian Embassy today.
“Yes, we
will also ask for clarification on the news,” the official, who declined to be
named, said.
It’s not
the first time that intelligence gathering in Jakarta by other nations has come
to the fore.
Intelligence
leaks to the media in the 1980s disclosed an installation of “extraordinarily
sophisticated’’ interception equipment in Australia’s High Commission in Port
Moresby and in the Australian Embassies in Jakarta and Bangkok.
Further
leaks of top-secret defense intelligence reports on Indonesia and East Timor in
1999 also indicated that Australia intelligence had extensive access to
sensitive Indonesian military and civilian communications.
Related Articles: